Paternity after vasectomy with two previous sem*n analyses without spermatozoa (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Sao Paulo Med J
  • v.125(2); 2007
  • PMC11014694

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Paternity after vasectomy with two previous sem*n analyses without spermatozoa (1)

Link to Publisher's site

Sao Paulo Med J. 2007; 125(2): 77–84.

Published online 2007 Mar 4. doi:10.1590/S1516-31802007000200011

PMCID: PMC11014694

PMID: 17625712

Language: English | Portuguese

Marcos Lucon,Paternity after vasectomy with two previous sem*n analyses without spermatozoa (2)* Antonio Marmo Lucon,* Fabio Firmbach Pasqualoto,* and Miguel Srougi*

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT:

The risk of paternity after vasectomy is rare but still exists. Overall failure to achieve sterility after vasectomy occurs in 0.2 to 5.3% of patients due to technical failure or recanalization. The objective of this report was to describe a rare but notable case of proven paternity in which the sem*n analyses had not given evidence of spermatozoa.

CASE REPORT:

A 44-year-old vasectomized man whose sem*n analyses had shown azoospermia became a father four years after sterilization. Blood sample DNA analysis on the child and husband proved biological paternity.

Vasectomy may fail in the long run even without spermatozoa in sem*n analysis. The patient must be aware of this possibility.

KEY WORDS: Vasectomy, Infertility, Paternity, Azoospermia, Fertility

RESUMO

CONTEXTO:

O risco de paternidade após vasectomia é raro, mas existente. Falha em atingir esterilidade após vasectomia ocorre em 0.2% a 5.3% dos pacientes devido à falha técnica ou recanalização. O objetivo é descrever um caso raro, mas importante, de paternidade comprovada cujo espermograma mostrava ausência de espermatozóides.

RELATO DE CASO:

Um homem de 44 anos vasectomizado, cujo espermograma evidenciou azoospermia, tornou-se pai após quatro anos da esterilização. Análise sanguínea por DNA da criança e do marido provou paternidade biológica. Vasectomia pode falhar a longo prazo até com azoospermia no espermograma. O paciente deve estar informado dessa possibilidade.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Vasectomia, Infertilidade, Paternidade, Oligospermia, Fertilidade

INTRODUCTION

The risk of paternity after vasectomy is rare but still exists. Overall failure to achieve sterility after vasectomy occurs in 0.2 to 5.3% of patients due to technical failure or recanalization. Early recanalization occurs in 0.36% and delayed recanalization in 1 in 2000.1 In these cases, sem*n analyses give evidence of spermatozoa. When there is postoperative azoospermia, it is believed that sterility is assured. However, six cases of proven paternity of a father without spermatozoa in sem*n analyses after vasectomy have been reported.2

OBJECTIVE

To describe another case of proven paternity of a father with negative sem*n analyses after vasectomy.

CASE REPORT

A 44-year-old man came to the Department of Urology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP). He had been vasectomized four years before, and sem*n analysis three months later had shown azoospermia. Four years after this surgery, his wife conceived and examination of sem*n one month after the beginning of the pregnancy did not give evidence of spermatozoa. After the delivery of a healthy child, a third sperm analysis showed no spermatozoa. However, blood sample DNA analysis on the child and husband proved biological paternity (Figure 1).

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

DNA analysis test proving the paternity of a vasectomized father.

DISCUSSION

Vasectomy is safe, easy and the most highly cost-effective method of contraception. It generally does not have any sequelae. The most serious complication is scrotal hematoma and, in the majority of cases, this can be treated conservatively.1,2

Failure of vasectomy may be a cause for legal action. Although a single negative sem*n examination indicates that the vasectomy was a success, routine analysis in the United Kingdom calls for two examinations.3 In the United States, 56% of the doctors require one, 39% require two and 5% ask for three sem*n examinations after vasectomy in order to confirm azoospermia.2 The risk of delayed recanalization is small and has been estimated to be as low as one in 2000 to 7000 patients.1 Late recanalization, shown by the presence of spermatozoa in the sem*n analysis after a previous negative result, has been found in 0.6 to 1%, although without resulting in pregnancy.3

Fertilization after successful vasectomy has already been reported. Smith et al. reported six cases of DNA-confirmed paternity in which sem*n analysis had been negative before conception.3 The case described here resulted in conception four years after vasectomy. The interval between vasectomy and late fertilization has ranged from eight months to ten years in the cases reported.1-4 Since fertilization occurred without positive sem*n analysis, it may be speculated that vas deferens permeability for spermatozoa was intermittent, as has already been suggested.3 The resulting risk of conception must not be underestimated. As there is no reliable method for identifying patients who may present recanalization, it is the doctor's responsibility to inform the patient of the remote possibility of fertilization in the long run. It must be emphasized, therefore, that vasectomy is not universally successful. Abstinence remains the only infallible method for contraception.

Therefore, vasectomized patients whose partners become pregnant should be counseled to undergo sperm examination and DNA analysis before any doubt regarding paternity is expressed.1,4

CONCLUSION

Vasectomy may fail in the long run even without spermatozoa in sem*n analysis after surgery. The patient must be aware of this possibility.

Biographies

Marcos Lucon. Resident in the Department of Urology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Antonio Marmo Lucon, MD, PhD. Associate professor, Department of Urology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Fabio Firmbach Pasqualoto. Biological Sciences Assistant, Health Center, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Miguel Srougi, MD, PhD. Chairman and professor, Department of Urology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Footnotes

Sources of funding: None

Department of Urology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

REFERENCES

1. Philp T, Guillebaud J, Budd D. Complications of vasectomy: review of 16,000 patients. Br J Urol. 1984;56(6):745–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Haws JM, Morgan GT, Pollack AE, Koonin LM, Magnani RJ, Gargiullo PM. Clinical aspects of vasectomies performed in the United States in 1995. Urology. 1998;52(4):685–691. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Smith JC, Cranston D, O'Brien T, Guillebaud J, Hindmarsh J, Turner AG. Fatherhood without apparent spermatozoa after vasectomy. Lancet. 1994;344(8914):30–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. O'Reilly PH, Gradwell M. Fatherhood with no apparent spermatozoa. BJU Int. 2000;86(3):407–407. [Google Scholar]

Articles from São Paulo Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Associação Paulista de Medicina

Paternity after vasectomy with two previous sem*n analyses without spermatozoa (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Errol Quitzon

Last Updated:

Views: 6444

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (79 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Errol Quitzon

Birthday: 1993-04-02

Address: 70604 Haley Lane, Port Weldonside, TN 99233-0942

Phone: +9665282866296

Job: Product Retail Agent

Hobby: Computer programming, Horseback riding, Hooping, Dance, Ice skating, Backpacking, Rafting

Introduction: My name is Errol Quitzon, I am a fair, cute, fancy, clean, attractive, sparkling, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.